April 3, 2009
Dear Friends and Neighbors,
In one sense, the wait
is now over: the House and Senate have released their
budgets dealing with our state's projected $9 billion
budget hole. In another sense, the waiting has just
begun as the majority party will now deliberate among
themselves over the coming weeks to rectify the
differences in each legislative body's spending
proposal.
I have looked
closely at both budgets and have
reservations about how they go about providing state
services and closing our budget shortfall. I
believe the budget proposals rely too
much on one-time money, attempt to lure you into
supporting a tax increase in the future, and set us up for budget
shortfalls again down the road.
Instead of
streamlining government and delivering services more
efficiently and effectively, the Senate and House
propose to use nearly $5 billion in one-time federal and
state money to backfill the overspending of the last
four years.
Because we're not actually making
significant, long-term changes to the process, we're
going to be right back in the same situation in the
following biennium. This is just delaying the
inevitable.
This is
also the first time, in my memory, that budget
writers have proposed using $780 million in
capital budget dollars for the operating budget.
The capital budget is the state's
construction budget. It is funded mostly
from state-issued bonds. By using capital
budget money – money that is acquired through
bonds and paid back over several years with
interest – we're in essence placing daily
expenses on the state's credit card which is a
shortsighted budget practice.
This sets us up for deficit spending down the
road.
The budgets also nearly
eliminate all of the I-728 class size reduction funding and
severely reduce health services for the truly
needy. I believe these cuts are
made in such a way of making the
most noise possible in order to convince the
public that a tax increase is needed to "buy
back" services.
|
 |
| |
Rep. Crouse with Legislative Marta
Nelson from Spokane Valley. |
In my opinion, a tax increase
is NOT needed, nor can we afford it. We
can
balance the budget, fund education and protect our most
vulnerable without raising taxes on hard-working
families.
Borrowing against our
future, relying upon one-time money, and hoping for a
tax increase at the ballot is not the type of leadership
our state needs right now. I will continue to work
with my colleagues to bring common-sense budget
reductions to our state spending plan.
Thank you
for your interest in these issues and thank you for allowing me to
represent you in Olympia.
Sincerely,
Larry Crouse State Representative, 4th
District
Cap and Trade
The Senate version of
Gov. Gregoire's cap and trade proposal,
Senate Bill 5735, was
recently voted out of the House Ecology
and Parks Committee. The governor's testimony made
it clear this is still a high priority for her
administration.
As you may recall, the so-called
cap and trade legislation is a proposal put forth by the
Western Climate Initiative, which includes seven Western
states and four Canadian Provinces. The idea is to cap
the amount of carbon that may be emitted by activities
such as energy and oil production, manufacturing jobs,
and, by 2015, auto emissions, in order to reach 1990
emission levels by 2020.
 |
I want you
to know that I continue to have serious concerns
about the costs this burdensome legislation will
have on employers and energy producers, not to
mention the higher costs passed on to
hard-working families. I don't think it's
a stretch to call it a huge transfer of wealth
as money goes from the private sector and
consumers to bigger government and Wall Street. I'll continue to update you on this
legislation as it moves along through the legislative
process. |
Domestic Partnerships
Senate Bill 5688, dubbed the "everything but
marriage" bill, recently passed the House Judiciary
Committee and is likely to come up for a vote in the
House soon. This bill would essentially redefine
traditional marriage and extend to homosexual domestic
partners all the rights and benefits of married
heterosexual couples.
I'm opposed to this bill.
This is one of the last steps towards legalizing gay
marriage in this state.
Visit my Website for further information
and news
You can always visit
my web site for updated information and to contact
me via e-mail. You can also sign-up for my
E-newsletter by going to my home page and clicking on
the "sign up here" link on the left side of the page.
|